Monty - Assay Results and Exploration Update
Released
Released
Announcement PDF
F o c u s e d A u s t r a l i a n M i n e r a l E x p lo r a t i o n C o m p a n y
Monty Exploration Update
th
5 November 2015
COMPANY SNAPSHOT
Board of Directors
Thick zone of bornite-bearing massive sulphides assays
at 34.4% copper
Highlights
Alan Senior
Non-Executive Chairman
Gary Lethridge
Managing Director
Brian Dawes
Non-Executive Director
Karen Gadsby
Non-Executive Director
• Outstanding thick high-grade copper intercept returned from recent stepout hole TLDD0026:
o
7.3 metres grading 6.2% Cu and 2.8g/t Au from 325.6m down-hole
(down-hole width, top of intercept is 275m vertically below surface)
o
21.6 metres grading 34.4% Cu and 0.4g/t Au from 339.4m down-hole
(down-hole width, top of intercept is 286m vertically below surface)
Contact Details
Telephone:
+61 8 9380 4230
Facsimile:
+ 61 8 9382 8200
Email:
info@talismanmining.com.au
Website:
www.talismanmining.com.au
Capital Structure
Shares on Issue:
148,559,904 (TLM)
Options on Issue:
6,400,000 (Unlisted)
ASX: TLM
Photo: Cross section through TLDD0026 NQ2 drill core showing bornite disseminated in
the matrix of the sulphides (359.3 metres down hole).
• Further high-grade assay results received from ongoing drilling, which
continues to confirm the grade, tenor and continuity of the Lower Zone at Monty.
New results include (all intercepts are down-hole widths):
o
1.5 metres grading 13.8% Cu and 1.1g/t Au from 272.3m down-hole
(TLDD0020)
o
3.4 metres grading 17.9% Cu and 3.9g/t Au from 239.0m down-hole
(TLDD0021)
o
8.0 metres grading 13.3% Cu and 1.8g/t Au from 286.2m down-hole
(TLDD0021)
o
2.6 metres grading 14.2% Cu and 1.1g/t Au from 445.6m down-hole
(TLDD0024)
• Drilling by Sandfire is continuing to define the extents of the
mineralisation at Monty with initial in-fill drilling of the known mineralisation
envelope also now underway.
Monty Update
Talisman Mining Limited (ASX: TLM “Talisman”) is pleased to announce that Sandfire Resources NL (ASX:
SFR; “Sandfire”) has provided an update on ongoing exploration activities at the Monty copper-gold discovery
within Talisman’s Springfield Project located approximately 10km east of the DeGrussa Copper-Gold Mine
(see Appendix 1).
The collar locations of advised holes drilled to date by Sandfire are shown in the plan view diagram below
(see Figure 1) and Table 1.
Figure 1: Plan view of Monty showing drill-hole collar locations and simplified interpreted geology.
Monty Lower Zone Assay Results
Sandfire have advised that assay results have been received for additional step-out diamond drill-holes
targeting the Lower Zone mineralisation including the recently reported zone of bornite-bearing massive
sulphides intersected in step-out hole TLDD0026.
Assay Results for TLDD0026
Diamond drill hole TLDD0026 was drilled approximately 45 metres along strike from recently reported hole
TLDD0021 (see TLM ASX announcement - 2 October 2015) and approximately 46 metres up-dip of the halo
mineralisation intersected in TLDD0014 (see Figures 1 and 2).
Sandfire have advised that TLDD0026 has returned exceptional assay grades of:
• 7.3 metres grading 6.2% Cu and 2.8g/t Au from 325.6m down-hole
(down-hole width, top of intercept is 275m vertically below surface); and
• 21.6 metres grading 34.4% Cu and 0.4g/t Au from 339.4m down-hole
(down-hole width, top of intercept is 286m vertically below surface).
Monty Update
Talisman is highly encouraged by an intersection of this magnitude which represents a further exciting
breakthrough in exploration activities at Monty.
Although the significance of this bornite-rich zone is not yet fully understood by Sandfire or Talisman, it is
pleasing to note that this 21.6 metre intersection of massive sulphides is interpreted to correlate with the
existing mineralisation in the lower zone intersected in previous drilling and previously described in the ASX
Announcements of 2nd and 15th October 2015.
Importantly the mineralisation in TLDD0026 is open up-dip with follow-up drilling planned by Sandfire.
Additional Lower Zone Assay Results
In addition to the exceptional result from TLDD0026, assays have been received for previously completed
holes TLDD0011, TLDD0014, TLDD0016, TLDD0020, TLDD0021 and TLDD0024 (significant intersections
to date are shown in Table 2).
Better assay results from the above holes, which continue to demonstrate extraordinary high copper grades,
include:
Hole ID
TLDD0020
TLDD0021
TLDD0024
Interval
1
2
From
(m)
To (m)
272.3
239.0
286.2
445.6
273.8
242.4
294.2
448.2
Downhole
Width (m)
Estimated
True
Width (m)
Cu (%)
Au (g/t)
1.5
3.4
8.0
2.6
0.9
1.8
4.6
1.7
13.8
17.9
13.3
14.2
1.1
3.9
1.8
1.1
Intersection
Geological Interpretation of Lower Zone
These latest results provide further support and assistance in confirming the continuity and grade of the
mineralisation intersected to date at Monty and have enabled Sandfire to provide an updated interpretation
of the geological setting of the known mineralisation.
An updated vertical longitudinal projection (looking to the south-east) is shown in Figure 2 on the following
page.
In line with the growing understanding of the variable orientations of the mineralisation at Monty, Sandfire
has provided true width estimates for the mineralisation for the first time. As noted in prior releases, the
estimated true widths for the Upper Zone mineralisation are significantly thinner than the down-hole widths
as shown in Table 2.
Monty Update
Figure 2: Vertical Longitudinal Projection and initial interpretation of the Monty Prospect with drill-hole pierce points at
the top of the primary intercept shown in bold. All intercepts are down-hole widths. A significant intersection is defined
here as any intersection ≥ 3m estimated true width that has a grade of ≥ 2.0 % Cu, inclusive of non-mineralised material.
To determine whether intersections that are <3m estimated true width are significant in terms of the above definition,
non-mineralised material has been included at a grade of 0.0% Cu (weighted by width) until a 3m estimated true width is
reached. If the overall grade remained >2.0% Cu, with the non-mineralised material included, then the intersection is
considered significant. New intersections (not previously reported) are highlighted in yellow.
Further Exploration Activity
Exploration of the Monty discovery continues to gather momentum with the exceptional results for step-out hole
TLDD0026 marking another significant milestone for the ongoing program.
Sandfire have advised that in addition to continuing drilling at Monty to define the extents of mineralisation, it will
be stepping up drilling capacity at Monty with a program of in-fill drilling recently commencing within the known
mineralised envelope.
It is expected that this in-fill drilling will continue through the quarter with the data to be used to underpin a
maiden Mineral Resource estimate which is planned by Sandfire during the first quarter of next year.
In addition to continuing step-out definition drilling along with the commencement of in-fill drilling around the
currently known mineralisation, Sandfire is also stepping further afield and actively targeting additional
accumulations of mineralisation along the entire 5km long Monty trend, which remains extremely prospective
for further discoveries.
Sandfire are also planning diamond drilling at Homer, located 4km along strike to the east of DeGrussa, during
this quarter with the objective of continuing to unlock the significant exploration potential of the broader
Springfield Project.
Monty Update
The Springfield Project is subject to an exploration farm-in joint venture between Sandfire and Talisman where
Sandfire has the right to earn up to a 70% interest in Talisman’s Doolgunna Projects by the expenditure of $15
million on exploration at the Doolgunna Projects.
ENDS
For further information, please contact:
Gary Lethridge – Managing Director
on +61 8 9380 4230
For media inquiries, please contact:
Nicholas Read – Read Corporate
on +61 419 929 046
Competent Person’s Statement
Information in this ASX release that relates to Exploration Results is based on informati on compiled by Mr Graham Leaver, who is
a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr Leaver is a full time employee of Talisman Mining Ltd and has sufficient
experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and types of deposit under consideration and to the activities undertaken
to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the “Australian Code for Reporting of Mineral Resources and
Ore Reserves”. Mr Leaver consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on information in the form and context in
which it appears.
Monty Update
Table 1 – Drill-hole Information Summary, Monty Prospect
Details and co-ordinates of all relevant drill hole collars are provided in the table below:
Hole ID
Depth
Dip
Azimuth
Grid_ID
East
North
RL
Lease ID
Hole Status
TLDD0002A
463
-61°
110°
MGA94_50
743544
7171211
602
E52/2282
Complete
TLDD0004A
817
-60°
148°
MGA94_50
743588
7171281
601
E52/2282
Complete
TLDD0005
478
-62°
139°
MGA94_50
743544
7171210
602
E52/2282
Complete
TLDD0006
554
-62°
140°
MGA94_50
743469
7171174
601
E52/2282
Complete
TLDD0007
589
-62°
138°
MGA94_50
743504
7171271
601
E52/2282
Complete
TLDD0008
688
-62°
138°
MGA94_50
743441
7171223
600
E52/2282
Complete
TLDD0009
472
-61°
140°
MGA94_50
743578
7171190
602
E52/2282
Complete
TLDD0010
433
-62°
142°
MGA94_50
743514
7171138
601
E52/2282
Complete
TLDD0011
472
-62°
141°
MGA94_50
743451
7171092
598
E52/2282
Complete
TLDD0012
598
-62°
140°
MGA94_50
743403
7171155
599
E52/2282
Complete
TLDD0014
399
-62°
143°
MGA94_50
743638
7171231
603
E52/2282
Complete
TLDD0015
376
-62°
146°
MGA94_50
743561
7171073
602
E52/2282
Complete
TLDD0016
274
-61°
147°
MGA94_50
743621
7171119
604
E52/2282
Complete
TLDD0017
236
-62°
146°
MGA94_50
743686
7171166
605
E52/2282
Complete
TLDD0018
340
-62°
146°
MGA94_50
743471
7171054
599
E52/2282
Complete
TLDD0019
552
-62°
141°
MGA94_50
743566
7171329
600
E52/2282
Complete
TLDD0020
340
-61°
141°
MGA94_50
743536
7171106
602
E52/2282
Complete
TLDD0021
331
-62°
144°
MGA94_50
743599
7171152
603
E52/2282
Complete
TLDD0022
304
-62°
141°
MGA94_50
743441
7171035
599
E52/2282
Complete
TLDD0024
571
-60°
141°
MGA94_50
743470
7171172
600
E52/2282
Complete
TLDD0026
409
-59°
141°
MGA94_50
743609
7171209
602
E52/2282
Complete
TLDD0028
441
-62°
143°
MGA94_50
743569
7171129
602
E52/2282
Complete
TLRC0003
544
-61°
144°
MGA94_50
743720
7171393
599
E52/2282
Complete
TLRC0004
306
-62°
142°
MGA94_50
743497
7171025
600
E52/2282
Complete
TLRC0006
318
-62°
143°
MGA94_50
743430
7170973
598
E52/2282
Complete
TLRC0008
294
-62°
143°
MGA94_50
743461
7171001
599
E52/2282
Complete
TLRC0009
265
-62°
141°
MGA94_50
743527
7171050
601
E52/2282
Complete
TLRC0012
210
-62°
143°
MGA94_50
743553
7171017
602
E52/2282
Complete
TLRC0015
138
-60°
320°
MGA94_50
743503
7170953
600
E52/2282
Complete
TLRC0016
120
-58°
317°
MGA94_50
743580
7170985
602
E52/2282
Complete
TLRC0017
120
-60°
318°
MGA94_50
743548
7170968
601
E52/2282
Complete
Monty Update
Table 2 – Drill-hole Assay Intersections >1% for the Monty Prospect
Details of all relevant intersections provided below. Estimated true widths have been calculated using estimated dip and dipdirection of modelled mineralisation surfaces at the drill-hole intersection and azimuth and dip of the drill-hole.
Hole ID
TLDD0004A
TLDD0005
TLDD0008
TLDD0009
TLDD0010
TLDD0011
TLDD0014
TLDD0016
TLDD0020
TLDD0021
TLDD0024
TLDD0026
TLRC0004
TLRC0008
TLRC0009
Interval
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
1
2
3
1
2
1
2
1
2
Intersection
From
(m)
To
(m)
Downhole
Width
(m)
Estimated
True Width
(m)
Cu (%)
Au (g/t)
Zn (%)
409.5
417.0
574.2
343.0
363.1
385.8
355.6
359.7
373.6
370.9
334.2
359.4
168.5
272.3
239.0
286.2
300.2
445.6
325.6
339.4
107.0
158.0
89.0
112.0
133.0
426.0
426.2
579.3
344.0
371.0
390.6
356.1
370.2
378.2
371.3
334.7
362.8
168.9
273.8
242.4
294.2
301.4
448.2
332.9
361.0
125.0
162.0
95.0
123.0
145.0
16.5
9.2
5.1
1.0
7.9
4.8
0.5
10.5
4.6
0.4
0.5
3.4
0.4
1.5
3.4
8.0
1.2
2.6
7.3
21.6
18.0
4.0
6.0
11.0
12.00
10.9
6.1
3.2
0.5
5.8
3.0
0.3
6.3
2.9
0.2
0.3
2.0
0.3
0.9
1.8
4.6
0.7
1.7
4.7
15.2*
5.1
1.2
1.4
2.5
2.8
18.9
11.8
1.4
8.6
8.3
4.9
1.2
18.9
12.8
1.2
3.6
3.5
1.4
13.8
17.9
13.3
3.8
14.2
6.2
34.4
5.7
4.2
7.8
15.0
5.7
2.1
2.9
0.1
0.3
2.4
1.1
1.4
3.1
2.5
1.3
0.1
0.8
0.1
1.1
3.9
1.8
1.7
1.1
2.8
0.4
2.4
0.7
0.9
1.9
1.8
1.5
2.3
0.0
0.1
2.1
1.4
0.2
1.1
0.8
0.9
0.0
0.6
0.0
1.2
0.3
2.1
1.2
0.6
3.1
0.8
3.2
0.1
0.9
1.0
2.2
* The orientation of the mineralisation from 339.4m – 361.0m in TLDD0026 is poorly constrained.
Consequently the estimated true width of this intersection should be viewed as preliminary.
Monty Update
Appendix 1: Talisman’s Doolgunna Copper-Gold Projects subject to the $15M Exploration Farm-In Joint Venture with Sandfire
Resources NL
Monty Update
Appendix 2 – Interpretive cross-section of the Monty mineralisation (Lower Zone)
Monty Update
Appendix 3 - JORC TABLE 1
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections)
Criteria
JORC Code explanation
Commentary
Sampling
techniques
• Nature and quality of sampling (e.g.
cut channels, random chips, or
specific specialised industry standard
measurement tools appropriate to the
minerals under investigation, such as
down-hole gamma sondes, or
handheld XRF instruments, etc).
These examples should not be taken
as limiting the broad meaning of
sampling.
• Include reference to measures taken
to ensure sample representivity and
the appropriate calibration of any
measurement tools or systems used.
• Aspects of the determination of
mineralisation that are Material to the
Public Report.
• In cases where ‘industry standard’
work has been done this would be
relatively simple (e.g. ‘reverse
circulation drilling was used to obtain
1 m samples from which 3 kg was
pulverised to produce a 30 g charge
for fire assay’). In other cases more
explanation may be required, such as
where there is coarse gold that has
inherent sampling problems. Unusual
commodities or mineralisation types
(e.g. submarine nodules) may warrant
disclosure of detailed information.
•
• Drill type (e.g. core, reverse
circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary
air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc)
and details (e.g. core diameter, triple
or standard tube, depth of diamond
tails, face-sampling bit or other type,
whether core is oriented and if so, by
what method, etc).
•
Sandfire diamond drilling is completed using
NQ2 size coring equipment.
•
RC drilling is with a face sampling hammer of a
nominal 140mm hole diameter.
•
•
All drill collars are surveyed using RTK GPS.
All core, where possible is oriented using a
Reflex ACT II RD orientation tool.
Downhole surveying is undertaken using a
gyroscopic survey instrument.
Drilling
techniques
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
The sampling method employed by Sandfire i s
h a l f -core sampling of NQ2 core from
diamond drilling (DD)
Sandfire collect RC samples by cone splitter for
single metre samples or a sampling spear for first
pass composite samples using a face sampling
hammer with a nominal hole diameter of 140mm
Sampling is guided by Sandfire protocols as per
industry standard.
Diamond drill core sample size reduction is
through a Jaques jaw crusher to -10mm and a
second stage reduction via Boyd crusher to 4mm.Representitive sub samples are split and
pulverised via an LM5 mill.
RC samples are crushed to -4mm through a
Boyd crusher and representative sub samples
are split and pulverised with an LM5 mill.
Pulverising is to nominal 90% passing -75µm and
is checked using wet sieving technique.
Samples are assayed using Mixed 4 Acid
Digest (MAD) 0.3g charge and MAD Hotbox
0.15g charge methods with ICPOES or ICPMS.
Fire Assay is completed by firing 40g portion of
the sample with ICPMS finish.
Monty Update
Drill sample
recovery
• Method of recording and assessing
core and chip sample recoveries and
results assessed.
• Measures taken to maximise sample
recovery and ensure representative
nature of the samples.
• Whether a relationship exists between
sample recovery and grade and
whether sample bias may have
occurred due to preferential loss/gain
of fine/coarse material.
•
•
•
•
•
Logging
Subsampling
techniques
and sample
preparation
• Whether core and chip samples have
been geologically and geotechnically
logged to a level of detail to support
appropriate Mineral Resource
estimation, mining studies and
metallurgical studies.
• Whether logging is qualitative or
quantitative in nature. Core (or
costean, channel, etc) photography.
• The total length and percentage of the
relevant intersections logged.
• If core, whether cut or sawn and
whether quarter, half or all core taken.
• If non-core, whether riffled, tube
sampled, rotary split, etc and whether
sampled wet or dry.
• For all sample types, the nature,
quality and appropriateness of the
sample preparation technique.
• Quality control procedures adopted
for all sub-sampling stages to
maximise representivity of samples.
• Measures taken to ensure that the
sampling is representative of the in
situ material collected, including for
instance results for field
duplicate/second-half sampling.
• Whether sample sizes are appropriate
to the grain size of the material being
sampled.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Sandfire diamond core recovery is logged and
captured into the database. Core recoveries are
measured by drillers for every drill run. The core
length recovered is physically measured for each
run and recorded and used to calculate the core
recovery as a percentage of core recovered.
Appropriate measures are taken to maximise
sample recovery and ensure the representative
nature of the samples. This includes diamond core
being reconstructed into continuous intervals on
angle iron racks for orientation, metre marking and
reconciled against core block markers.
RC sample recovery is good with almost no wet
sampling in the project area
Samples are routinely weighed and the information
captured into the central secured database.
No sample recovery issues have impacted on
potential sample bias
Sandfire Geological logging is completed for all
holes and is representative across the orebody.
The lithology, alteration and structural
characteristics of core are logged directly to a
digital format following procedures, and using
Sandfire NL geologic codes. Data is imported into
Sandfire NL’s central database after validation in
LogChief™.
Logging is both qualitative and quantitative
depending on field being logged.
All cores are photographed.
All drill holes are fully logged.
Sandfire complete diamond core orientation
where possible and all core is marked prior to
sampling. Half core samples are produced using
an Almonte Core Saw. Samples are weighed and
recorded.
RC samples are split using a cone or riffle splitter.
The majority of samples collected are dry. On
occasion that wet samples are encountered they
are dried prior to splitting with a riffle splitter.
All samples are sorted, dried at 80° for up to 24
hours and weighed. Samples are then crushed
through a Jaques crusher to nominal -10mm. A
second stage crushing is through a Boyd crusher
to nominal -4mm.
Sample splits are weighed at a frequency of 1:20
and entered into the job results file. Pulverising is
completed using LM5 mill to 90% passing 75%µm
using wet sieving technique.
1:20 grind quality checks are completed for 90%
passing
75%µm
criteria
to
ensure
representativeness of sub-samples.
Monty Update
•
Subsampling
techniques
and sample
preparation
(Continued)
Quality of
assay data
and
laboratory
tests
•
•
• The nature, quality and
appropriateness of the assaying and
laboratory procedures used and
whether the technique is considered
partial or total.
• For geophysical tools, spectrometers,
handheld XRF instruments, etc, the
parameters used in determining the
analysis including instrument make
and model, reading times, calibrations
factors applied and their derivation,
etc.
• Nature of quality control procedures
adopted (e.g. standards, blanks,
duplicates, external laboratory
checks) and whether acceptable
levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias)
and precision have been established.
•
•
•
•
Verification
of sampling
and
assaying
• The verification of significant
intersections by either independent or
alternative company personnel.
• The use of twinned holes.
• Documentation of primary data, data
entry procedures, data verification,
data storage (physical and electronic)
protocols.
• Discuss any adjustment to assay
data.
•
•
•
•
Sampling is carried out in accordance with
Sandfire protocols as per industry best practice.
No field duplicates have been taken.
The sample sizes are considered appropriate for
VHMS and Gold mineralisation types.
Samples are assayed using Mixed 4 Acid Digest
(MAD) 0.3g charge and MAD Hotbox 0.15g
charge methods with ICPOES or ICPMS. The
samples are digested and refluxed with a mixture
of acids including Hydrofluoric, Nitric,
Hydrochloric and Perchloric acids and analysis
conducted for multi elements including Cu, Pb,
Zn, Ag, As, Fe, S, Sb, Bi, Mo, Re, Mn, Co, Cd,
Cr, Ni, Se, Te, Ti, Zr, V, Sn, W and Ba. The MAD
Hotbox method is an extended digest method
that approaches a total digest for many elements
however some refractory minerals are not
completely attacked. The elements S, Cu, Zn,
Co, Fe, Ca, Mg, Mn, Ni, Cr, Ti, K, Na, V are
determined by ICPOES, and Ag, Pb, As, Sb, Bi,
Cd, Se, Te, Mo, Re, Zr, Ba, Sn, W are
determined by ICPMS. Samples are analysed for
Au, Pd and Pt by firing a 40g of sample with ICP
AES/MS finish. Lower sample weights are
employed where samples have very high S
contents. This is a classical FA process and
results in total separation of Au, Pt and Pd in the
samples.
The analytical methods are considered
appropriate for this mineralisation styles.
No geophysical tools are used in the analysis.
Sandfire DeGrussa QAQC protocol is considered
industry standard with standard reference
material (SRM) submitted on regular basis with
routine samples. SRMs and blanks are inserted
at a minimum of 5% frequency rate.
Significant intersections have been verified by
alternate Sandfire personnel.
None of the drillholes in this report are twinned.
Primary data is captured on field Toughbook
laptops using Logchief™ Software. The software
has validation routines and data is then imported
into a secure central database.
The primary data is always kept and is never
replaced by adjusted or interpreted data.
Monty Update
Location of
data points
• Accuracy and quality of surveys used to
locate drill holes (collar and down- hole
surveys), trenches, mine workings and
other locations used in Mineral
Resource estimation.
• Specification of the grid system used.
• Quality and adequacy of topographic
control.
•
•
•
•
•
The Sandfire Survey team undertakes survey
works under the guidelines of best industry
practice.
All drill collars are accurately surveyed using
RTK GPS system within +/-50mm of accuracy (X,
Y, Z).
Downhole surveys are completed by gyroscopic
downhole methods at regular intervals.
Coordinate and azimuth are reported in MGA 94
Zone 50.
Topographic control was established from LiDar
laser imagery technology
• Data spacing for reporting of
Exploration Results.
• Whether the data spacing and
distribution is sufficient to establish the
degree of geological and grade
continuity appropriate for the Mineral
Resource and Ore Reserve estimation
procedure(s) and classifications
applied.
• Whether sample compositing has been
applied.
•
• Whether the orientation of sampling
achieves unbiased sampling of possible
structures and the extent to which this
is known, considering the deposit type.
• If the relationship between the drilling
orientation and the orientation of key
mineralised structures is considered to
have introduced a sampling bias, this
should be assessed and reported if
material.
•
Sample
security
• The measures taken to ensure sample
security.
•
Sandfire ensures appropriate security measures
are taken to dispatch samples to the laboratory.
Chain of custody of samples is being managed
by Sandfire Resources NL. Samples are stored
onsite and transported to laboratory by a licence
transport company in sealed bulka bags. The
laboratory receipts received samples against the
sample dispatch documents and issues a
reconciliation report for every sample batch.
Audits or
reviews
• The results of any audits or reviews of
sampling techniques and data.
•
Sandfire have not completed any external audits
or reviews of the sampling techniques and data
Data
spacing
and
distribution
Orientation
of data in
relation to
geological
structure
•
•
•
•
Drill spacing is currently defined by geological
criteria and is regarded as appropriate to
determine the extents of mineralisation. This
spacing is nominally 80m x 80m. Spacing is
shown by the accompanying tables and figures.
Some holes are drilled at a closer spacing to
determine the edges of mineralisation.
Exploration drilling at Monty is preliminary and
spacing and distribution of exploration results is
not sufficient to support Mineral Resources or
Ore Reserves.
No sample compositing has been applied to
these exploration results.
No significant orientation based sampling bias is
known at this time.
The drill holes may not necessarily be
perpendicular to the orientation of the intersected
mineralisation.
Down-hole intervals are converted to estimated
true widths.
Monty Update
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections)
Criteria
JORC Code explanation
Commentary
Mineral
tenement and
land tenure
status
• Type, reference name/number, location
and ownership including agreements or
material issues with third parties such
as joint ventures, partnerships,
overriding royalties, native title
interests, historical sites, wilderness or
national park and environmental
settings.
• The security of the tenure held at the
time of reporting along with any known
impediments to obtaining a licence to
operate in the area.
• Tenements E52/2282, E52/2313 and E52/2466
form Talisman’s 100% owned Springfield Project,
150km north-east of Meekatharra, WA. Sandfire
is currently farming into the project on a staged
basis with the right to earn 70% interest in the
project
•
•
All tenements are current and in good standing.
The Talisman tenements are currently subject to a
Native Title Claim by the Yungunga-Nya People
(WAD6132/98). Sandfire currently has a Land
Access Agreement in place with the YungungaNya Native Title Claimants and have assumed
management of Heritage Agreements which were
executed by Talisman. These agreements allow
Sandfire to carry out mining and exploration
activities on their traditional land.
Exploration
done by other
parties
• Acknowledgment and appraisal of
exploration by other parties.
• Aside from Sandfire Resources and Talisman
Mining Limited there has been no recent
exploration undertaken on the Talisman Project.
• Historic exploration work at Springfield completed
prior to Talisman’s tenure included geochemical
soil and rock chip sampling combined with
geological mapping. Some targeted RC drilling
was completed over gold and diamond targets.
Geology
• Deposit type, geological setting and
style of mineralisation.
•
•
•
Talisman’s Doolgunna Project lies within the
Proterozoic-aged Bryah rift basin enclosed
between the Archaean Marymia Inlier to the north
and the Proterozoic Yerrida basin to the south.
The principal exploration targets at the Doolgunna
Projects are Volcanogenic Massive Sulphide
(VMS) deposits located with the Proterozoic Bryah
Basin of Western Australia.
The discovery of Bornite at Doolgunna is new and its
full context and implication is still to be determined.
Monty Update
Drill hole
Information
• A summary of all information material to
the understanding of the exploration
results including a tabulation of the
following information for all Material drill
holes:
o easting and northing of the drill hole
collar
o elevation or RL (Reduced Level –
elevation above sea level in metres)
of the drill hole collar
o dip and azimuth of the hole
o down hole length and interception
depth
o hole length.
•
Refer to Table 1 of this document – Drillhole
Information Summary, Monty Prospect.
If the exclusion of this information is
justified on the basis that the
information is not Material and this
exclusion does not detract from the
understanding of the report, the
Competent Person should clearly
explain why this is the case.
Data
aggregation
methods
• In reporting Exploration Results,
weighting averaging techniques,
maximum and/or minimum grade
truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades)
and cut-off grades are usually Material
and should be stated.
• Where aggregate intercepts incorporate
short lengths of high grade results and
longer lengths of low grade results, the
procedure used for such aggregation
should be stated and some typical
examples of such aggregations should
be shown in detail.
• The assumptions used for any reporting
of metal equivalent values should be
clearly stated.
•
•
•
•
•
•
Significant intersections are based on greater
than 0.5% Cu and may include up to a
maximum of 3.0m of internal dilution, with a
minimum composite grade of 1.0% Cu.
Cu grades used for calculating significant
intersections are uncut.
Minimum and maximum diamond core sample
intervals used for intersection calculation are
0.3m and 1.2m respectively subject to location
of geological boundaries.
Reported intersections from RC drilling are based
on regular 1 metre
Share your feedback
Discover