Monty Prospect - Assay Results
Released
Released
Announcement PDF
25 June 2015
COMPANY SNAPSHOT
Board of Directors
Alan Senior
Non-Executive Chairman
Gary Lethridge
Managing Director
Brian Dawes
Non-Executive Director
Karen Gadsby
Non-Executive Director
Monty Prospect – Assay Results
Talisman Mining Limited (ASX: TLM “Talisman”) is pleased to announce that Sandfire
Resources NL (ASX: SFR; “Sandfire”) has advised that it has received assay results
from diamond drill hole TLDD0004A at the Monty Prospect within Talisman’s Springfield
Project which is part of an exploration farm-in joint venture between Talisman and
Sandfire.
The results confirm that TLDD0004A has intersected a significant zone of high-grade
copper-gold mineralisation approximately 10km east of Sandfire’s DeGrussa CopperGold Mine, with final assays returning an exceptional massive sulphide intercept of:
16.5 metres grading 18.9% Cu and 2.1g/t Au from 409.5m to 426m down-hole
(not true width, from 365m below surface vertical depth)
Full details of the hole are provided in Tables 1 and 2.
Contact Details
6 Centro Avenue
Subiaco, Western
Australia, 6008
Telephone:
+61 8 9380 4230
TLDD0004A was drilled as a follow-up hole to TLDD0002A, completed by Sandfire last
month, and was designed to intersect an off-hole EM response detected in a down-hole
electro-magnetic (DHEM) survey on the hole.
The intersection in TLDD0004A represents a significant development for both Talisman
and Sandfire and progresses the ongoing exploration efforts within the exploration farmin joint venture. While exploration of this emerging VMS prospect is still at an early
stage, the width, exceptional grade and tenor of the copper-gold mineralisation
intersected is considered to be very encouraging.
Facsimile:
+61 8 9382 8200
Email:
info@talismanmining.com.au
Website:
www.talismanmining.com.au
Capital Structure
Shares on Issue:
131,538,627 (TLM)
Options on Issue:
7,250,000 (Unlisted)
ASX: TLM
Sandfire’s Exploration Manager – Doolgunna
Ian O'Grady, examining drill core from hole
TLDD0004A
Massive sulphide mineralisation from hole
TLDD0004A
Assay Results – Monty Prospect
This is the first significant intersection of high-grade copper-gold mineralisation to be discovered within
either Talisman’s or Sandfire’s Doolgunna Projects outside of the known lenses of VMS mineralisation at
DeGrussa. Additionally, the massive sulphide mineralisation intersected in TLDD0004A (see core photos
above and Figure 1) is considered by Sandfire to be similar to that seen in the DeGrussa, Conductor 1, 2,
4 and 5 VMS lenses and occurs within a host sequence that bears many similarities to that which hosts the
massive sulphide mineralisation at DeGrussa.
Sandfire have advised that TLDD0004A is still in progress and is currently at a depth of 745 metres downhole. The hole has been extended beyond the mineralisation to provide Sandfire’s geological team with
valuable geological and geochemical information together with accurate stratigraphic controls for ongoing
exploration of this exciting emerging area.
A follow-up hole, TLDD0005, will be collared to intersect the target horizon approximately 80 metres southwest of the intersection in TLDD0004A (see Figure 3). TLDD0005 is expected to commence as soon as
TLDD0004A is completed.
This step-out hole will also be guided by an updated interpretation of the DHEM information currently at
hand to Sandfire. This updated interpretation has applied a lower conductance threshold to the modelled
DHEM plate (originally modelled at 5,500 Siemens). The resulting interpretation by Sandfire has extended
the modelled dimensions of the plate, although the plunge component of the conductive body remains
unknown at this point and will need to be determined by further drilling.
Down-hole EM surveys will be undertaken by Sandfire on both TLDD0004A and TLDD0005 and Sandfire
have advised that further drilling of this emerging prospect will be undertaken as a priority in the coming
weeks.
Sandfire has the right to earn up to a 70% interest in Talisman’s Doolgunna Project (including Springfield)
by the expenditure of $15 million on exploration at the Projects.
ENDS
For further information, please contact:
Gary Lethridge – Managing Director
on +61 8 9380 4230
For media inquiries, please contact:
Nicholas Read – Read Corporate
on +61 419 929 046
Assay Results – Monty Prospect
Table 1 – Drill-hole Information Summary, Springfield Project
Details and coordinates of the historical drill-hole SPD021 and recent drill holes completed by Sandfire at the
Springfield Project, TLDD0001, TLDD0002A, TLDD0003 and TLDD0004A, together with details of the planned
step-out drill hole TLDD0005, are provided below:
Hole ID
Depth
Dip
Azimuth
Grid_ID
East
North
RL
Lease ID
Hole Status
SPD021
553
-60°
180°
MGA94_50
743598
7171437
598
E52/2282
Complete
TLDD0001
1099
-60°
360°
MGA94_50
740146
7174149
589
E52/2313
Complete
TLDD0002A
500
-60°
112°
MGA94_50
743544
7171211
602
E52/2282
Complete
TLDD0003
658
-60°
360°
MGA94_50
740596
7174550
589
E52/2282
Complete
TLDD0004A
Ongoing
-60°
148°
MGA94_50
743588
7171281
601
E52/2282
In Progress
TLDD0005
-
-62°
138°
MGA94_50
743544
7171211
602
E52/2282
Planned
Table 2 – Detailed Assay Results, TLDD0004A
Intersection
Mineralisation
From (m)
To (m)
Intercept
Down Hole
Cu
(pct)
Au
(ppm)
Ag
(ppm)
Zn
(pct)
Sample Type
405
406
1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
Half Core
406
407
1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
Half Core
407
407.6
0.6
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
Half Core
407.6
408.5
0.9
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
Half Core
408.5
409.5
1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
Half Core
409.5
410.3
0.8
0.7
0.1
0.6
0.1
Half Core
410.3
410.6
0.3
11.1
2.0
12.3
0.8
Half Core
410.6
411.2
0.6
0.9
0.7
2.7
0.6
Half Core
411.2
411.9
0.7
5.0
2.9
9.0
2.3
Half Core
411.9
412.5
0.6
11.8
3.8
14.0
1.2
Half Core
412.5
413
0.5
26.9
1.9
18.6
1.1
Half Core
413
414
1
25.6
2.6
20.2
0.7
Half Core
414
415
1
24.0
2.4
24.4
3.5
Half Core
415
416
1
24.2
2.3
27.1
3.1
Half Core
416
417
1
17.5
2.4
19.5
0.5
Half Core
417
418
1
20.3
2.9
21.9
1.1
Half Core
418
419
1
29.2
0.8
20.4
0.2
Half Core
419
420
1
28.7
0.6
19.6
0.3
Half Core
420
421
1
19.8
6.4
29.8
4.1
Half Core
421
422
1
25.0
5.2
35.2
3.0
Half Core
422
423
1
28.1
0.9
28.7
1.2
Half Core
423
424
1
22.4
1.0
28.4
2.0
Half Core
424
424.4
0.4
21.8
1.5
32.7
1.4
Half Core
424.4
425
0.6
12.8
0.5
8.4
0.2
Half Core
425
425.7
0.7
3.6
0.6
4.1
0.1
Half Core
425.7
426
0.3
0.5
0.0
0.7
0.1
Half Core
426
427
1
0.1
0.0
0.2
0.1
Half Core
427
428
1
0.1
0.0
0.2
0.1
Half Core
428
429
1
0.2
0.0
0.2
0.0
Half Core
Note: Calculation is based on a 0.5% cut-off, no more than 3m of internal dilution and a minimum composite grade of 1%.
Intersection length (m), Cu (%), Au (ppm), Ag (ppm) and Zn (%) are rounded to 1 decimal point.
Assay Results – Monty Prospect
The host unit of the mineralisation intersected in TLDD0004A is bounded to the top and the bottom by dolerite
sills that exhibit no evidence of alteration and/or mineralisation. The dolerite sills are interpreted to have intruded
the host unit after the mineralisation developed. In TLDD0004A, the host unit itself comprises rapidly alternating
(centimetre-scale) interlayered sandstone, siltstone and shale sedimentary rocks (see Figure 1 below).
The upper half of the sedimentary package has been intruded by basalt intrusive rocks that exhibit peperite
contact zones. Peperites are created when magma (basalt) intrudes, and mixes with, wet sediments. Very
similar features have been documented at the DeGrussa mine where, in the Conductor 5 deposit, massive
sulphide mineralisation often occurs in the peperite contact zone between basalt sills and inter-layered
sandstone, siltstone and shale.
Figure 1 – Drill core from TLDD0004A
The upper contact of massive sulphide mineralisation in TLDD0004A is situated in a zone of peperites that
occur at the base of the basalts. The peperite host rock exhibits a narrow zone (a down-hole interval of 5.4
metres) of strong chlorite alteration with both blebby (primary) and vein-hosted (re-mobilised) sulphides
immediately above the massive sulphide.
The lower contact of the massive sulphide is in contact with inter-layered sandstone, siltstone and shale which
has been variably chlorite altered for a down-hole interval of 19.6 metres, at which point the post-mineralisation
dolerite is intersected. The chlorite alteration zone below the massive sulphides contains minor blebby and
remobilised sulphides. Asymmetric chlorite alteration zones containing blebby and remobilised sulphide have
been well documented peripheral to the massive sulphide deposits at the DeGrussa mine.
Assay Results – Monty Prospect
Figure 2: Plan view of Sandfire’s Greater Doolgunna Project, showing the Springfield Project and the location of drill
hole TLDD0004A at the Monty Prospect (in progress)
Figure 3 – Plan view showing location of recent drilling by Sandfire relative to the DeGrussa Copper Mine, including the
high-grade intersection in TLDD0004A and planned step-out hole TLDD0005
Assay Results – Monty Prospect
Competent Person’s Statement
Information in this ASX release that relates to Exploration Results and Mineral Resources is based on information compiled
by Mr Graham Leaver, who is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr Leaver is a full time employee of
Talisman Mining Ltd and has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and types of deposit under
consideration and to the activities undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the
“Australian Code for Reporting of Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves”. Mr Leaver consents to the inclusion in this report
of the matters based on information in the form and context in which it appear.
Assay Results – Monty Prospect
Appendix 1 - JORC TABLE 1
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections)
Criteria
JORC Code explanation
Commentary
Sampling
techniques
Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut
channels, random chips, or specific
specialised industry standard
measurement tools appropriate to the
minerals under investigation, such as
down-hole gamma sondes, or handheld
XRF instruments, etc). These examples
should not be taken as limiting the broad
meaning of sampling.
Include reference to measures taken to
ensure sample representivity and the
appropriate calibration of any
measurement tools or systems used.
Aspects of the determination of
mineralisation that are Material to the
Public Report.
In cases where ‘industry standard’ work
has been done this would be relatively
simple (e.g. ‘reverse circulation drilling
was used to obtain 1 m samples from
which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a
30 g charge for fire assay’). In other
cases more explanation may be required,
such as where there is coarse gold that
has inherent sampling problems.
Unusual commodities or mineralisation
types (e.g. submarine nodules) may
warrant disclosure of detailed
information.
The sampling method employed by Sandfire i s
half-core sampling of NQ2 core from diamond
drilling (DD)
Sampling is guided by Sandfire protocols as per
industry standard.
Sample size reduction is through a Jaques jaw
crusher to -10mm and all samples are Boyd
crushed to -4mm and pulverised via LM5 to
nominal 90% passing -75µm using wet sieving
technique.
Samples are assayed using Mixed 4 Acid
Digest (MAD) 0.3g charge and MAD Hotbox 0.15g
charge methods with ICPOES or ICPMS.
Fire Assay is completed by firing 40g portion of the
sample with ICPMS finish.
Drilling
techniques
Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation,
open-hole hammer, rotary air blast,
auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details
(e.g. core diameter, triple or standard
tube, depth of diamond tails, facesampling bit or other type, whether core
is oriented and if so, by what method,
etc).
Sandfire diamond drilling is completed using NQ2
size coring equipment.
All drill collars are surveyed using RTK GPS.
All core where possible is oriented using a Reflex
ACT II RD orientation tool.
Downhole surveying is undertaken using a
gyroscopic survey instrument.
Assay Results – Monty Prospect
Drill
sample
recovery
Method of recording and assessing core
and chip sample recoveries and results
assessed.
Measures taken to maximise sample
recovery and ensure representative
nature of the samples.
Whether a relationship exists between
sample recovery and grade and whether
sample bias may have occurred due to
preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse
material.
Sandfire diamond core recovery is logged and
captured into the database. Core recoveries are
measured by drillers for every drill run. The core
length recovered is physically measured for each
run and recorded and used to calculate the core
recovery as a percentage of core recovered.
Appropriate measures are taken to maximise
sample recovery and ensure the representative
nature of the samples. This includes diamond core
being reconstructed into continuous intervals on
angle iron racks for orientation, metre marking and
reconciled against core block markers.
Samples are routinely weighed and the information
captured into the central secured database.
No sample recovery issues have impacted on
potential sample bias
Logging
Whether core and chip samples have
been geologically and geotechnically
logged to a level of detail to support
appropriate Mineral Resource estimation,
mining studies and metallurgical studies.
Whether logging is qualitative or
quantitative in nature. Core (or costean,
channel, etc) photography.
The total length and percentage of the
relevant intersections logged.
Sandfire Geological logging is completed for all
holes and is representative across the orebody.
The lithology, alteration and structural
characteristics of core are logged directly to a
digital format following procedures, and using
Sandfire NL geologic codes. Data is imported into
Sandfire NL’s central database after validation in
LogChief™.
Logging is both qualitative and quantitative
depending on field being logged.
All cores are photographed.
All drill holes are fully logged.
Subsampling
techniques
and
sample
preparation
If core, whether cut or sawn and whether
quarter, half or all core taken.
If non-core, whether riffled, tube
sampled, rotary split, etc and whether
sampled wet or dry.
For all sample types, the nature, quality
and appropriateness of the sample
preparation technique.
Quality control procedures adopted for all
sub-sampling stages to maximise
representivity of samples.
Measures taken to ensure that the
sampling is representative of the in situ
material collected, including for instance
results for field duplicate/second-half
sampling.
Whether sample sizes are appropriate to
the grain size of the material being
sampled.
Sandfire complete diamond core orientation
where possible and all core is marked prior to
sampling. Half core samples are produced using
an Almonte Core Saw. Samples are weighed and
recorded.
All samples are sorted, dried at 80° for up to 24
hours and weighed. Samples are then crushed
through Jaques crusher to nominal -10mm. A
second stage crushing is through Boyd crusher to
nominal -4mm. Sample splits are weighed at a
frequency of 1:20 and entered into the job results
file. Pulverising is completed using LM5 mill to
90% passing 75%µm using wet sieving technique.
1:20 grind quality checks are completed for 90%
passing
75%µm
criteria
to
ensure
representativeness of sub-samples.
Sampling is carried out in accordance with
Sandfire protocols as per industry best practice.
No field duplicates have been taken.
The sample sizes are considered appropriate for
VHMS and Gold mineralisation types.
Assay Results – Monty Prospect
Quality of
assay data
and
laboratory
tests
The nature, quality and appropriateness
of the assaying and laboratory
procedures used and whether the
technique is considered partial or total.
For geophysical tools, spectrometers,
handheld XRF instruments, etc, the
parameters used in determining the
analysis including instrument make and
model, reading times, calibrations factors
applied and their derivation,etc.
Nature of quality control procedures
adopted (e.g. standards, blanks,
duplicates, external laboratory checks)
and whether acceptable levels of
accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision
have been established.
Samples are assayed using Mixed 4 Acid Digest
(MAD) 0.3g charge and MAD Hotbox 0.15g charge
methods with ICPOES or ICPMS. The samples are
digested and refluxed with a mixture of acids
including Hydrofluoric, Nitric, Hydrochloric and
Perchloric acids and analysis conducted for multi
elements including Cu, Pb, Zn, Ag, As, Fe, S, Sb,
Bi, Mo, Re, Mn, Co, Cd, Cr, Ni, Se, Te, Ti, Zr, V,
Sn, W and Ba. The MAD Hotbox method is an
extended digest method that approaches a total
digest for many elements however some refractory
minerals are not completely attacked. The
elements S, Cu, Zn, Co, Fe, Ca, Mg, Mn, Ni, Cr, Ti,
K, Na, V are determined by ICPOES, and Ag, Pb,
As, Sb, Bi, Cd, Se, Te, Mo, Re, Zr, Ba, Sn, W are
determined by ICPMS. Samples are analysed for
Au, Pd and Pt by firing a 40g of sample with ICP
AES/MS finish. Lower sample weights are
employed where samples have very high S
contents. This is a classical FA process and results
in total separation of Au, Pt and Pd in the samples.
The analytical methods are considered appropriate
for this mineralisation styles.
No geophysical tools are used in the analysis.
Sandfire DeGrussa QAQC protocol is considered
industry standard with standard reference material
(SRM) submitted on regular basis with routine
samples. SRMs and blanks are inserted at a
minimum of 5% frequency rate.
Verification
of
sampling
and
assaying
The verification of significant
intersections by either independent or
alternative company personnel.
The use of twinned holes.
Documentation of primary data, data
entry procedures, data verification, data
storage (physical and electronic)
protocols.
Discuss any adjustment to assay data.
Significant intersections have been verified by
alternate Sandfire personnel.
No twinned holes are being drilled as part of this
programme.
Primary data is captured on field Toughbook
laptops using Logchief™ Software. The software
has validation routines and data is then imported
into a secure central database.
The primary data is always kept and is never
replaced by adjusted or interpreted data.
Assay Results – Monty Prospect
Location of
data points
Accuracy and quality of surveys used to
locate drill holes (collar and down- hole
surveys), trenches, mine workings and
other locations used in Mineral Resource
estimation.
Specification of the grid system used.
Quality and adequacy of topographic
control.
The Sandfire Survey team undertakes survey
works under the guidelines of best industry
practice.
All drill collars are accurately surveyed using RTK
GPS system within +/-50mm of accuracy (X, Y, Z).
Coordinates are based on control previously
established by MHR Surveyors which was derived
by ties into the Government SSM/BM network.
Downhole surveys are completed by gyroscopic
downhole methods at regular intervals.
Coordinate and azimuth are reported in MGA 94 Zone
50.
Topographic control was established from aerial
photography using a series of 33 surveyed control
points.
Data
spacing
and
distribution
Data spacing for reporting of Exploration
Results.
Whether the data spacing and distribution
is sufficient to establish the degree of
geological and grade continuity
appropriate for the Mineral Resource and
Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s)
and classifications applied.
Whether sample compositing has been
applied.
TLDD0004A is the first drill hole to intersect the
modelled EM plate. It is not possible to make any
conclusion regarding sample spacing and
distribution.
No sample compositing has been applied to these
exploration results.
Orientation
of data in
relation to
geological
structure
Whether the orientation of sampling
achieves unbiased sampling of possible
structures and the extent to which this is
known, considering the deposit type.
If the relationship between the drilling
orientation and the orientation of key
mineralised structures is considered to
have introduced a sampling bias, this
should be assessed and reported if
material.
No significant orientation based sampling bias is
known at this time. Drill hole TLDD0004A was
oriented to intersect a modelled EM plate. The drill
hole may not necessarily be perpendicular to the
orientation of the intersected mineralisation. All
reported intervals are downhole intervals, not true
widths.
Sample
security
The measures taken to ensure sample
security.
Sandfire ensures appropriate security measures
are taken to dispatch samples to the laboratory.
Chain of custody of samples is being managed by
Sandfire Resources NL. Samples are stored onsite
and transported to laboratory by a licence transport
company in sealed bulka bags. The laboratory
receipts received samples against the sample
dispatch documents and issues a reconciliation
report for every sample batch.
Audits or
reviews
The results of any audits or reviews of
sampling techniques and data.
The Sandfire sampling techniques and data
collection processes are of industry standard and
have been subjected to multiple internal and
external reviews.
Assay Results – Monty Prospect
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections)
Criteria
Mineral
tenement
and land
tenure
status
JORC Code explanation
Type, reference name/number, location
and ownership including agreements or
material issues with third parties such as
joint ventures, partnerships, overriding
royalties, native title interests, historical
sites, wilderness or national park and
environmental settings.
The security of the tenure held at the time
of reporting along with any known
impediments to obtaining a licence to
operate in the area.
Exploration
done by
other
parties
Acknowledgment and appraisal of
exploration by other parties.
Geology
Deposit type, geological setting and style
of mineralisation.
Commentary
Diamond drilling by Farm-in Partner Sandfire is on
tenement E52/2282. Tenements E52/2282,
E52/2313 and E52/2466 form Talisman’s 100%
owned Springfield Project, 150km north-east of
Meekatharra, WA. Sandfire is currently farming
into the project on a staged basis with the right to
earn 70% interest in the project
All tenements are current and in good standing.
The Talisman tenements are currently subject to a
Native Title Claim by the Yungunga-Nya People
(WAD6132/98). Sandfire currently has a Land
Access Agreement in place with the Yungunga-Nya
Native Title Claimants and have assumed
management of Heritage Agreements which were
executed by Talisman. These agreements allow
Sandfire to carry out mining and exploration
activities on their traditional land.
Aside from Sandfire Resources and Talisman
Mining Limited there has been no recent
exploration undertaken on the Talisman Project.
Historic exploration work at Springfield completed
prior to Talisman’s tenure included geochemical
soil and rock chip sampling combined with
geological mapping. Some targeted RC drilling
was completed over gold and diamond targets.
Talisman’s Doolgunna Project lies within the
Proterozoic-aged Bryah rift basin enclosed between
the Archaean Marymia Inlier to the north and the
Proterozoic Yerrida basin to the south.
The principal exploration targets at the Doolgunna
Projects are Volcanogenic Massive Sulphide (VMS)
deposits located with the Proterozoic Bryah Basin of
Western Australia.
Assay Results – Monty Prospect
Drill hole
Information
A summary of all information material to
the understanding of the exploration
results including a tabulation of the
following information for all Material drill
holes:
o easting and northing of the drill hole
collar
o elevation or RL (Reduced Level –
elevation above sea level in metres) of
the drill hole collar
o dip and azimuth of the hole
o down hole length and interception
depth
o hole length.
Refer to Table 1 of this document – Drillhole
Information Summary, Springfield Project.
If the exclusion of this information is
justified on the basis that the information is
not Material and this exclusion does not
detract from the understanding of the
report, the Competent Person should
clearly explain why this is the case.
Data
aggregatio
n methods
In reporting Exploration Results, weighting
averaging techniques, maximum and/or
minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of
high grades) and cut-off grades are usually
Material and should be stated.
Where aggregate intercepts incorporate
short lengths of high grade results and
longer lengths of low grade results, the
procedure used for such aggregation
should be stated and some typical
examples of such aggregations should be
shown in detail.
The assumptions used for any reporting of
metal equivalent values should be clearly
stated.
Significant intersections are based on greater than
0.5% Cu and may include up to a maximum of
3.0m of internal dilution, with a minimum
composite grade of 1.0% Cu.
Cu grades used for calculating significant
intersections are uncut.
Reported intersections are based on a regular
sample interval of 1m or 5m composites in regular
drilling subject to location of geological boundaries.
Minimum and maximum sample intervals used for
intersection calculation are 0.3m and 1.2m
respectively.
No metal equivalents are used in the intersection
calculation.
Where core loss occurs; the average lengthweighted grade of the two adjacent samples are
attributed to the interval for the purpose of
calculating the intersection. The maximum interval
of missing core which can be incorporated with
the reported intersection is 1m.
Relationshi
p between
mineralisati
on widths
and
intercept
lengths
These relationships are particularly
important in the reporting of Exploration
Results.
If the geometry of the mineralisation with
respect to the drill-hole angle is known, its
nature should be reported.
If it is not known and only the down hole
lengths are reported, there should be a
clear statement to this effect (e.g. ‘down
hole length, true width not known’).
Downhole intercepts of mineralisation reported in
this release are from a drill hole orientated
perpendicular to a modelled EM plate. The drill
hole may not necessarily be perpendicular to the
mineralised zone. All widths reported are downhole
intervals.
The geometry of the mineralisation, relative to the
drill hole, is unknown at this stage.
All intersections reported in this release are
downhole intervals. True widths are not known.
Assay Results – Monty Prospect
Diagrams
Appropriate maps and sections (with
scales) and tabulations of intercepts
should be included for any significant
discovery being reported These should
include, but not be limited to a plan view of
drill hole collar locations and appropriate
sectional views.
Appropriate maps with scale are included within
the body of the accompanying document.
Balanced
reporting
Where comprehensive reporting of all
Exploration Results is not practicable,
representative reporting of both low and
high grades and/or widths should be
practiced to avoid misleading reporting of
Exploration Results.
The accompanying document is considered to
represent a balanced report.
Other
substantive
exploration
data
Other exploration data, if meaningful and
material, should be reported including (but
not limited to): geological observations;
geophysical survey results; geochemical
survey results; bulk samples – size and
method of treatment; metallurgical test
results; bulk density, groundwater,
geotechnical and rock characteristics;
potential deleterious or contaminating
substances.
Other exploration data collected is not considered
as material to this document at this stage. Further
data collection will be reviewed and reported when
considered material.
Further
work
The nature and scale of planned further
work (e.g. tests for lateral extensions or
depth extensions or large-scale step-out
drilling).
Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of
possible extensions, including the main
geological interpretations and future
drilling areas, provided this information is
not commercially sensitive.
Sandfire have indicated to TLM that additional down
hole geophysics (DHEM) and drilling will occur to
define the extent of the intersected mineralisation
Share your feedback
Discover