Epithermal Gold Potential Identified at Carpina North
Released
Released
Announcement PDF
20 July 2023
Epithermal Gold Potential Identified at Carpina North
as Drilling Advances Across NSW Lachlan Project
Systematic testing of geophysical targets continues with drilling currently in progress
at an AEM anomaly 20km from Cobar.
Highlights:
•
Multiple intervals of +1g/t gold mineralisation returned for drill-holes displaying disseminated
and veined sulphides at the Carpina North and Stella Prospects, within Talisman’s Lachlan
Copper-Gold Project in NSW.
•
The association of the gold with arsenic (As) and antimony (Sb) geochemistry, with silica
textures observed in RC drill chips, is consistent with a low-sulphidation epithermal gold system.
•
Limited initial RC drilling (5 holes/1,326m) returned narrow intervals of copper-gold
mineralisation associated with the north-south trend of chargeable anomalies at the Stella
Prospect. Further work is underway to determine the potential location of higher-grade zones.
•
Gold mineralisation at Carpina North shows an association with fine grained pyrite, arsenopyrite
and pyrrhotite, suggesting that chargeable anomalies may provide further exploration targets.
•
Drilling of an AEM anomaly located 20km north-east of Cobar is currently in progress and
expected to be completed by late July.
Talisman Mining Ltd (ASX: TLM, Talisman) is pleased to provide an update on ongoing drilling and
exploration activities at its 100%-owned Lachlan Copper-Gold Project (Lachlan Project) in NSW
(Appendix 1).
Figure 1 - Reverse circulation drill rig operating at the Carpina North Gold Prospect.
1
Overview
Talisman has a dominant strategic position in the world-class Lachlan Orogen of NSW with five
projects covering a total area of 6,200km2 (Appendix 1).
The Company commenced an expansive, systematic and multi-pronged exploration program
focusing on the Central Lachlan Project earlier this year, with the aim of developing a staged
exploration pipeline that is constantly replenished through ongoing geophysics and geochemistry
programs.
Reverse Circulation (RC) drilling of 12 initial geophysical targets identified from regional airborne
and geophysical surveys has been in progress since the start of this year, with results reported in
this announcement including from the Carpina North, Stella, Pines, Galway and Rainbow Folds
prospects.
RC drilling is continuing with activities currently focused on the Damascus AEM anomaly, located on
Exploration Licence 9298, located 20km north-east of Cobar (Appendix 1).
Drilling of this AEM anomaly, identified from Talisman’s previous regional-scale airborne geophysical
surveys 1, represent the first exploration activities in this area. Talisman currently expects to complete
drilling of this target by the end of July.
Auger drilling grids have been completed at the Stella Prospect (Exploration Licence (EL) 8571) and
the Gwando Prospect (EL8615) with assays pending. Auger drilling activities are currently in
progress on EL8414. Further auger geochemistry grids are planned over identified target areas on
Exploration Licences 8547, 8680, 8659, 8677 and 9298.
Geophysics is in progress at the Durnings Prospect (EL8680), with a gradient array induced
polarisation (GAIP) grid seeking to constrain further drill targets associated with mineralisation
intersected during previous drilling 2.
The next phase of RC and diamond drilling will focus on following up high-grade gold results at
Durnings, as well as testing geophysical and geochemical targets generated by Talisman during the
first half of 2023. This will include testing the conductive anomalies at the Rip n Tear Prospect on
EL8615, a high priority conductivity anomaly associated with extensive base metal geochemical
anomalism.
Management Comment
Talisman’s CEO, Shaun Vokes, said: “We have received encouraging results from our ongoing field
programs throughout the first half of 2023, with detailed results reported in this announcement from
a number of areas.
“While we haven’t yet made an economic discovery, our drilling continues to intersect significant
mineralisation and generate plenty of indicators of the potential to vector into a significant
accumulation of mineralisation.
1
2
Refer Talisman ASX announcements dated 17 January 2022, 30 March 2022, 26 July 2022 and 16 November 2022 for full details.
Refer Talisman ASX announcement dated 15 May 2023 for full details.
2
“The pervasive gold anomalism associated with the Carpina North Prospect and its potential
interplay with the copper anomalism identified at the Stella Prospect to the south is particularly
promising and warrants follow-up work.
“As our field work progresses, our understanding of the complex structural setting of our Central
Lachlan Project is improving, which in turn will allow us to improve our targeting methodology. We
continue to generate a strong target pipeline based on a rapidly increasing dataset.
“Talisman remains well funded to continue with substantive exploration programs in order to make
the next major discovery in the Lachlan Fold Belt.”
Exploration Licence EL8571
Carpina North Prospect
Four RC holes (CNRC0013-CNRC0016) for a total of 876 metres were drilled (Table 1) at the
Carpina North Prospect (Appendix 1) to follow up on the gold results returned in drill-hole
CNRC0012, which was completed as part of the 2022 drill program and which returned 40m @
0.51g/t Au from 24m down-hole 3 as part of a wider mineralised zone (Figure 2).
Figure 2 – Carpina North 2023 RC drilling, Holes CNRC0011-CNRC0016. Significant intercepts are labelled.
3
Refer Talisman ASX announcement dated 26 July 2022 for full details including JORC tables
3
Significant gold results have been returned in drill-hole CNRC0014, with a number of mineralised
zones above 1g/t Au encountered down the hole (Figure 3). Intercepts include:
•
8m @ 0.71g/t Au from 16m down-hole including 2m @ 1.42g/t Au from 22m down-hole;
•
2m @ 2.77g/t Au from 134m down-hole;
•
14m @ 0.51g/t Au from 146m down-hole including 4m @ 1.35g/t Au from 156m down-hole; and
•
2m @ 1.04g/t Au from 210m down-hole.
Other drill-holes also returned significant gold assays, including:
CNRC0015
• 2m @ 1.02g/t Au from 102m; and
•
8m @ 1.06g/t Au from 116m including 2m @ 1.95g/t Au from 122m.
CNRC0016
• 14m @ 0.74g/t Au from 62m including 6m @ 1.18 g/t Au from 70m;
•
10m @ 0.40g/t Au from 90m; and
•
2m @ 0.65g/t Au from 168m.
A full list of significant results is provided in Table 2.
No significant gold results were encountered in CNRC0013, which has constrained the
mineralisation to the east of current drilling, suggesting that the mineralised zone strikes north-south
parallel to regional structures of the Mineral Hill Volcanic Belt (Appendix 1).
Figure 3 – Interpreted Carpina North Section A-A', along 6423500mN. Holes oblique to section are not projected to section.
4
All of the drill-holes completed at Carpina North intersected a sequence of massive, fine-grained
phyllites with occasional psammite interbeds, and the mineralisation appears to be visually
associated with intermittent quartz veining hosting polymetallic (galena-chalcopyrite-arsenopyrite)
sulphides and silica flooding of psammite sequences (Figure 4).
Figure 4 – RC chip samples from CNRC0014, 206-212m down-hole, displaying quartz veining and silica flooding.
The gold mineralisation has geochemical associations with arsenic (As) and antimony (Sb). These
element associations, together with the visual quartz textures, suggest that Talisman’s drilling has
intersected the “mixing” zones of a low-sulphidation epithermal gold mineral system (Figure 5),
similar to that mined previously at Mount Boppy, which lies approximately 90km to the north-east in
a similar structural position within the Cobar Basin’s eastern margin.
The implication of the drilling intersecting an interpreted “mixing” zone is the inferred existence of a
high-grade “boiling” portion of the system proximal to current drilling, which in a conventional
epithermal system may be host to high-grade precious metals (Au-Ag) (Figure 5).
5
Interpreted current drilling
Mixing Zone
Boiling Zone
Figure 5 – Conceptual Low-Sulphidation Epithermal Gold System Model, after Buchanan, 1981 4 and Wilson & Tunningley, 2013 5
Further work on the Carpina North Prospect is planned to include involve geophysical surveys and
further drilling in order to develop a comprehensive understanding of the structural architecture of
the prospect area. This will assist Talisman in vectoring towards a potential high-grade boiling zone
within the epithermal system.
Stella Prospect
At the Stella Prospect (Appendix 1), two trends of anomalous chargeability were previously identified
through Pole-Dipole Induced Polarisation (PDIP) surveys 6. An initial five RC holes for a total of 1,326
metres was drilled (Table 1), targeting both the Eastern and Western anomalies in order to determine
the source of the chargeability response (Figure 6). The drill-holes were targeted on four areas of
the chargeable anomaly thought to be discrete chargeable features.
All holes, WLRC0001-WLRC0005, intersected a thick sequence of massive phyllites with minor
disseminated pyrite-pyrrhotite, thought to be the source of the chargeable anomaly.
4
5
6
Buchanan, L.J., 1981, Precious metal deposits associated with volcanic environments in the Southwest. Arizona Geological Society Digest 14.
Wilson, C. and Tunningley, A. 2013. Understanding Low Sulphidation (LS) Epithermal Deposits. Association of Mining Analysts, London, July 2013.
Refer Talisman ASX announcement dated 8th May 2023 for full details.
6
Figure 6 - Stella Prospect RC drilling and copper assay results.
Visual chalcopyrite mineralisation was identified in WLRC0004 over a two-metre interval from 282m,
with the chalcopyrite hosted in a quartz breccia associated with local sericitization. WLRC0005 was
drilled on a shallower angle and was expected to intersect an interpreted vertical mineralised
structure above this mineralisation, however no comparable visual interval was intersected.
WLRC0005 did intersect Pb-Zn mineralisation at EOH which remains open at depth, returning 2m
@ 0.44% Zn, 0.21% Pb.
No significant intersections were identified in WLRC0003. Low-grade copper mineralisation was
identified coincident with visual chalcopyrite in WLRC0001, which returned an intersection of 2m @
0.22% Cu from 154m.
Significant intersections for the Stella prospect are provided in Table 2.
Down-hole Electro-Magnetic (DHEM) surveying on WLRC0001-WLRC0004 did not identify
significant conductors in close proximity to the drill-holes. This is consistent with visual observations
of copper mineralisation and sulphides as being disseminated or breccia-hosted with insufficient
connectivity to return a conductive response.
These initial results confirm the presence of north-south trending copper mineralisation at the Stella
Prospect associated with the chargeable anomaly trend and are encouraging for the presence of
copper mineralisation laterally and at depth.
7
A historic copper mine working is located immediately to the south of the current drilling along the
same north-south trend (Figure 5), which anecdotally yielded a head grade of 17.25% copper from
mineralisation hosted in quartz breccia 7.
Further work, including additional geophysics and drilling, is being planned to assess the prospect’s
potential and possible links to the nearby Carpina North Prospect.
Exploration Licence EL8414
On Exploration Licence 8414 (EL8414) (Appendix 1), three VTEM Max Airborne Electro-Magnetic
(AEM) anomalies and one FALCON Airborne Gravity Gradiometry (AGG) anomaly, identified from
Talisman’s previous regional-scale airborne geophysical surveys1, were drill tested with seven holes
for a total of 1,652 metres (Table 1).
The AEM anomalies were moderate priority anomalies which indicated mid-time conductivity
responses, and also exhibited highly deformed geological structure and quartz veining in outcrop
with anomalous bismuth in open file surface geochemistry, making them targets of interest.
Drilling at each AEM anomaly did not encounter notable down-hole geochemistry results, alteration
or structure. The basement rocks encountered in drilling were a sequence of variable conglomerates,
sandstones and siltstones. Subsequent DHEM surveying also did not identify any significant
anomalies and it is thought that these initial AEM anomalies were representative of minor
stratigraphic contacts within the basement sequence.
Drilling at the Galway AGG anomaly did not directly explain the AGG anomaly, however a sequence
of siliceous sandstones with minor quartz-carbonate veining was encountered. Disseminated pyrite
and pyrrhotite were observed within the sandstone unit and contained within the quartz-carbonate
veins, suggesting a deeper intrusive source.
The Company’s interpretation is that the gravity anomaly is likely to be representative of a porphyritic
intrusion associated with the Mount Walton porphyry, located 1km to the west.
No immediate follow-up work is planned on these target areas. Auger drilling is currently underway
on other areas within the Exploration Licence area to provide first-pass surface geochemistry over
areas under shallow cover.
Exploration Licence EL8658
On Exploration Licence 8658 (EL8658) (Appendix 1), two AEM anomalies were tested at the Pines
and the Rainbow Folds prospects. These anomalies were discrete late-time AEM responses which
were strong Maxwell plate models.
The anomalies were located in areas hosting metamorphosed siltstones and conglomerates.
Mapping of the areas identified brecciated quartz veins and weak iron alteration at surface,
suggestive of the weathering of sulphide-bearing quartz stockworks.
7
Refer GNSW DiGS Report R00011195, Explanatory Notes GS1980/452, Mine data sheets to accompany the Nymagee 1:250,000 metallogenic map.
8
The Pines Prospect
Two RC holes for a total of 504 metres (BBRC0006 and BBRC0007) were drilled (Table 1) into the
AEM response at the Pines. No significant intercepts were returned, however favourable quartz vein
textures and alteration were observed down-hole in BBRC0006. This included stockwork quartz
veining, pervasive silicification, moderate chloritization and both disseminated and blebby pyrrhotite
and pyrite associated with increased magnetism, suggesting that this hole is proximal to a zone of
structurally controlled hydrothermal activity potentially linked to further polymetallic mineralisation.
A definitive source for the Maxwell plate model at the Pines prospect was not intersected and downhole electromagnetic surveys were inconclusive due to both holes collapsing prior to the survey.
Further work on the wider Pines prospect area is planned and will involve drill testing of a subtle
magnetic feature 220m south-west of existing drilling, which is interpreted to be associated with
pyrrhotite mineralisation. Additional magnetic “bulls-eye” anomalies nearby will also be drill tested
for the presence of sulphide mineralisation.
Rainbow Folds Prospect
At the Rainbow Folds prospect, two RC holes (BBRC0008 and BBRC0009) for 492 metres were
drilled. Both holes intersected a graphitic shale unit closely associated with the modelled AEM plate,
which is thought to be the source of the strike-parallel AEM anomaly. No additional work is planned
at this prospect at this stage, with other targets being prioritised.
Ends
For further information, please contact:
Shaun Vokes – CEO
on +61 8 9380 4230
Nicholas Read (Media inquiries)
on +61 419 929 046
This release has been authorised by the Board of Talisman Mining Limited.
9
Table 1: Drill-hole information summary
Details and coordinates of the RC Holes relevant to this release.
Exploration
Licence
Prospect
Hole ID
Easting
Northing
RL
Dip
Azimuth
EOH
Depth
EL8571
Stella
WLRC0001
468139
6420073
326
-70
23.61
288
EL8571
Stella
WLRC0002
468120
6420528
325
-69.75
92.87
222
EL8571
Stella
WLRC0003
469892
6420533
228
-69.38
93.92
216
EL8571
Stella
WLRC0004
468420
6421271
337
-69.84
263.66
300
EL8571
Stella
WLRC0005
468417
6421271
337
-60.09
270.08
300
EL8414
Mt Walton
MWRC0001
456612
6432791
342
-60.3
90.41
222
EL8414
Mt Walton
MWRC0002
461857
6434234
308
-60.28
219.91
222
EL8414
Mt Walton
MWRC0003
460182
6438026
321
-60.29
240.61
222
EL8414
Mt Walton
MWRC0004
459977
6437909
324
-60.42
61.58
222
EL8414
Galway
MWRC0005
464725
6440609
300
-60.66
78.46
228
EL8414
Galway
MWRC0006
464543
6440546
302
-60.57
73.16
226
EL8414
Galway
MWRC0007
464352
6440495
297
-60.44
29.67
240
EL8658
The Pines
BBRC0006
458034
6468592
299
-60
67.92
294
EL8658
The Pines
BBRC0007
458137
6468555
295
-59.86
65.45
210
EL8658
Rainbow Folds
BBRC0008
456658
6476474
310
-60.01
240.69
282
EL8658
Rainbow Folds
BBRC0009
456934
6476481
307
-60
240
210
EL8571
Carpina North
CNRC0013
468608
6423504
347
-69.59
244.87
204
EL8571
Carpina North
CNRC0014
468515
6423487
341
-59.88
242.74
270
EL8571
Carpina North
CNRC0015
468494
6423605
333
-60.05
149.98
204
EL8571
Carpina North
CNRC0016
468423
6423563
357
-59.85
146.08
198
10
Table 2: RC drill-hole assay intersections for Mineralized Zones (Significant Intersections)
Details of significant RC drilling intersections received to date for the Carpina North and Stella prospects by
Talisman are provided below.
All Table 2 intersections are length-weighted assay intervals from two metre assay intervals taken directly from
the drill rig splitter. Appendix 2 contains full details on sampling and data aggregation methods including cutoff grades.
Depth
From
(m)
Depth
To (m)
Interval
(m)
Ag (g/t)
Zn (%)
Pb (%)
Au (g/t)
Cu (%)
CNRC0014
16
24
8
0.71
Including
22
24
2
1.42
CNRC0014
94
96
2
0.57
CNRC0014
134
136
2
2.77
CNRC0014
152
160
8
0.75
Including
156
160
4
1.35
CNRC0014
180
182
2
0.76
CNRC0014
210
212
2
1.04
CNRC0014
218
220
2
0.31
CNRC0014
224
226
2
0.55
CNRC0014
230
232
2
0.39
CNRC0015
80
82
2
0.29
CNRC0015
102
104
2
1.02
CNRC0015
116
124
8
1.06
Including
122
124
2
1.95
CNRC0016
62
76
14
0.74
Including
70
76
6
1.18
CNRC0016
90
100
10
0.40
CNRC0016
116
118
2
0.40
CNRC0016
124
126
2
0.32
CNRC0016
168
170
2
0.65
WLRC0001
154
156
2
0.22%
WLRC0002
212
214
2
0.46%
WLRC0004
84
86
2
0.27
WLRC0004
186
188
2
0.28
WLRC0004
282
284
2
WLRC0005
298
300
2
Comments
0.47%
0.44
0.21
All listed intersections are reported as down hole intersections. True widths of the reported mineralisation are
not known at this time.
11
About Talisman Mining
Talisman Mining Limited (ASX:TLM) is an Australian mineral development and exploration company. The Company’s aim is to
maximise shareholder value through exploration, discovery and development of complementary opportunities in base and
precious metals.
Talisman has secured tenements in the Cobar/Mineral Hill region in Central NSW through the grant of its own Exploration Licenses
and through a joint venture agreement. The Cobar/Mineral Hill region is a richly mineralised district that hosts several base and
precious metal mines including the CSA, Tritton, and Hera/ Nymagee mines. This region contains highly prospective geology that
has produced many long-life, high-grade mineral discoveries. Talisman has identified a number of areas within its Lachlan Cu-Au
Project tenements that show evidence of base and precious metals endowment which have had very little modern systematic
exploration completed to date. Talisman believes there is significant potential for the discovery of substantial base metals and
gold mineralisation within this land package and is undertaking active exploration to test a number of these targets.
Talisman also has a majority participating interest in a joint venture with privately-owned Lucknow Gold Limited in relation to the
Lucknow Gold Project (EL6455) in New South Wales. The Lucknow Goldfield was discovered in 1851 and was one of the earliest
goldfields to be mined commercially in Australia. Historic production records at the Project are incomplete, however in excess of
400,000 ounces of gold has reportedly been produced at grades of 100 to 200 g/t gold 8.Very little modern exploration has been
completed outside of the existing mine workings and Talisman intends to undertake a program of geochemical surface sampling
and mapping at the Project ahead of a drilling program to test for potential down plunge extensions of the high-grade gold ore
shoots and repeat structures throughout the Project area.
Competent Person’s Statement
Information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results and Exploration Targets is based on, and fairly represents
information and supporting documentation complied by Mr Russ Gregory, who is a member of the Australasian Institute of
Geoscientists. Mr Gregory is a full-time employee of Talisman Mining Ltd and has sufficient experience which is relevant to the
style of mineralisation and types of deposits under consideration and to the activities undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person
as defined in the 2012 Edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore
Reserves”. Mr Gregory has reviewed the contents of this announcement and consents to the inclusion in this announcement of
all technical statements based on his information in the form and context in which they appear.
Forward-Looking Statements
This ASX release may include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts but rather
are based on Talisman Mining Ltd.’s current expectations, estimates and assumptions about the industry in which Talisman Mining
Ltd operates, and beliefs and assumptions regarding Talisman Mining Ltd.’s future performance. Words such as “anticipates”,
“expects”, “intends”, “plans”, “believes”, “seeks”, “estimates”, “potential” and similar expressions are intended to identify forwardlooking statements. Forward-looking statements are only predictions and are not guaranteed, and they are subject to known and
unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions, some of which are outside the control of Talisman Mining Ltd. Past performance
is not necessarily a guide to future performance and no representation or warranty is made as to the likelihood of achievement or
reasonableness of any forward-looking statements or other forecast. Actual values, results or events may be materially different
to those expressed or implied in this presentation. Given these uncertainties, recipients are cautioned not to place reliance on
forward looking statements. Any forward looking statements in this announcement speak only at the date of issue of this
announcement. Subject to any continuing obligations under applicable law and the ASX Listing Rules, Talisman Mining Ltd does
not undertake any obligation to update or revise any information or any of the forward looking statements in this announcement
or any changes in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such forward looking statement is based.
8
NSW DIGS report, First Annual Exploration Report EL5770, 2001 -R00030162
12
Appendix 1
Lachlan Copper- Gold Project Tenure
EL9298 – Bengal &
Damascus Prospects
EL8658 – Rainbow Folds
& The Pines Prospects
EL8414 – Galway, Mayo
and Kildare Prospects
EL8571 – Carpina North
& Stella Prospects
13
Appendix 2
JORC Tables Section 1 & 2
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections)
Criteria
Sampling
techniques
JORC Code explanation
•
•
Drilling
techniques
Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut
channels, random chips, or specific specialised
industry standard measurement tools
appropriate to the minerals under investigation,
such as down-hole gamma sondes, or
handheld XRF instruments, etc.). These
examples should not be taken as limiting the
broad meaning of sampling.
Include reference to measures taken to
ensure sample representivity and the
appropriate calibration of any measurement
tools or systems used.
•
Aspects of the determination of mineralisation
that are Material to the Public Report. In cases
where ‘industry standard’ work has been done
this would be relatively simple (e.g. ‘reverse
circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m
samples from which 3kg was pulverised to
produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other
cases, more explanation may be required, such
as where there is coarse gold that has inherent
sampling problems. Unusual commodities or
mineralisation types (e.g. submarine nodules)
may warrant disclosure of detailed information.
•
Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, openhole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka,
sonic, etc) and details (e.g. core diameter,
triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails,
face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is
oriented and if so, by what method, etc).
Commentary
•
RC samples are collected at two metre intervals via a drill
rig mounted cyclone and static cone splitter set to a 12%
split to produce a nominal 4-7kg sample which was
collected in a pre-numbered sample bag.
•
Sampling is controlled by Talisman protocols and QAQC
procedures as per industry standard and a chain of custody
maintained through transfer to ALS Laboratories in Orange,
NSW
•
RC samples were dried, crushed (where required), split
and pulverised (total prep) to produce a master pulp. From
this master pulp, a 0.25g sub sample was taken for multielement analysis by four acid digest with an ICP-MS finish.
A 30g sub sample was also taken for fire assay with ICPAES finish.
•
RC drilling cited in this report was undertaken by
Resolution Drilling Pty Ltd using a UDR1200 multipurpose
truck-mounted drill rig operating in a Reverse Circulation
configuration. A truck-mounted booster and compressor
provided high pressure air with an auxiliary compressor
used where ground conditions warranted.
RC drilling was completed with a face sampling hammer of
nominal 150mm size.
•
Drill sample
recovery
•
Method of recording and assessing core and
chip sample recoveries and results
assessed.
•
Measures taken to maximise sample
recovery and ensure representative nature of
the samples.
•
•
•
•
RC drill sample recovery is generally high with sample
recoveries and quality recorded in the database by the
logging geologist
Sample recoveries were monitored in real-time by the
presence of Talisman personnel at the drill site.
No known relationship exists between recovery and grade
and no known bias exists.
Whether a relationship exists between
sample recovery and grade and whether
sample bias may have occurred due to
preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.
14
Criteria
Logging
Sub-sampling
techniques
and sample
preparation
Quality of
assay data
and laboratory
tests
Verification of
sampling and
assaying
JORC Code explanation
•
Whether core and chip samples have been
geologically and geotechnically logged to a
level of detail to support appropriate Mineral
Resource estimation, mining studies and
metallurgical studies.
•
Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative
in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc.)
photography.
•
The total length and percentage of the
relevant intersections logged.
•
If core, whether cut or sawn and whether
quarter, half or all core taken.
•
If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled,
rotary split, etc. and whether sampled wet or
dry.
•
For all sample types, the nature, quality and
appropriateness of the sample preparation
technique.
•
Quality control procedures adopted for all
sub-sampling stages to maximise
representivity of samples.
•
Measures taken to ensure that the sampling
is representative of the in-situ material
collected, including for instance results for
field duplicate/second-half sampling.
•
Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the
grain size of the material being sampled.
•
The nature, quality and appropriateness of
the assaying and laboratory procedures used
and whether the technique is considered
partial or total.
•
For geophysical tools, spectrometres,
handheld XRF instruments, etc, the
parametres used in determining the analysis
including instrument make and model,
reading times, calibrations factors applied
and their derivation, etc.
•
Nature of quality control procedures adopted
(e.g. standards, blanks, duplicates, external
laboratory checks) and whether acceptable
levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and
precision have been established.
•
The verification of significant intersections by
either independent or alternative company
personnel.
Commentary
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
RC logging records lithology, mineralogy, mineralisation,
alteration, structure, weathering, colour and other primary
features of the rock samples and is considered to be
representative across the intercepted geological units.
RC logging is both qualitative and quantitative depending
on the field being logged.
All RC drill-holes are logged in full to end of hole.
RC samples were dried, crushed (where required), split
and pulverised (total prep) to produce a 0.25g sub sample
for base metal analysis or a 30g sub sample for gold
analysis by fire assay
QAQC protocols for all RC sampling involved the use of
Certified Reference Material (CRM) as assay standards.
All QAQC controls and measures were routinely reviewed.
Sample size is considered appropriate for geochemical
sampling for base-metal and gold mineralisation given the
nature of drilling and anticipated distribution of
mineralisation.
Field duplicates were collected at a 1 in 30 sample rate.
QAQC protocols for all RC sampling involved the use of
certified reference materials as assay standards, inserted
at a 1 in 50 sampling rate.
Blank samples were inserted at a 1 in 50 sampling rate
using
Share your feedback
Discover